The criticisms have diminished so much that analytically, it is very hard to give negative criticisms... However there are some, and here they are:
- Reporters need to use better headline clips.
- White balance needs to remain consistent.
- Gun mic was in shot in places.
- A greater variation needs to be put in place for interviewing sequences.
- More even length for all interviewees.
- Poor graphic image.
- Expected package lengths were not what they were originally set as, which caused confusion.
- Presenter talking over people speaking in headline clips.
- Lack of sound in GVs.
- Jolty cuts in interview audio.
- Overuse of walking shots.
- Some voiceover soundtracks sounded echoey.
All in all, the bulletin was arguably the best yet with a professional and compelling bulletin having been produced, which would have appealed to all demographics.
No comments:
Post a Comment